Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

This general ledger supports multiple GAAPs in parallel. For  

For each GAAP it can be decided if the implementation should cover a

...

Figure: Drilldown from general ledger account balance 


A

...

  • All financial instruments and 
  • All non-financial instruments as well as
  • All valuation elements

As such, a full-size general ledger reflects the entire business of an entity. 

It provides specific general ledger functionalities such as

  • valuation of account balances in FX and posting of the related FX result
  • profit and loss zeroisation at the end of a configurable fiscal period

Beside comprehensive financial statements, the functionality includes the support of analysing, reporting and presentation requirements.

A shadow ledger concentrates on an excerpt of the business of an entity. This excerpt can be for example “All financial instruments” or a “Loan Ledger”.

...

The decision which implementation type of a general ledger in FlexFinance fits best should include the following aspects:

  • No third-party general ledger is in place
  • A third-party general ledger is in place, but 
    • does not support the drilldown of general ledger account balances to individual deal level (often third-party general ledgers work at aggregated level only)
    • does not support the breakdown of account balances to freely definable portfolios (often third-party general ledgers are limted to 3 to 5 criteria which can be used for drilldown)

...

General Ledger consists of

  • Balance Sheet
  • Profit and Loss
  • Chart of Accounts

It can deal with

  • Multiple GAAPs in parallel (The General Ledger contains a separate chart of accounts for each GAAP)
  • Multiple tennants (The General Ledger supports consolidated views)
  • Multiple currencies (The General Ledger keeps all bookings in original transaction currency as well as in functional currency)

The General Ledger

  • Allows analysis at account, product, customer, business and project level with results aggregated at account / cost center level.
  • Allows more accurate and efficient product control as entries are made at detailed and consolidated levels.
  • Enables easier automation of reconciliation with minimal manual intervention as detailed or transaction-based data can be tracked and analysed in multiple dimensions.

In a multi-GAAP environment, it is possible to run e.g.  a full-size general ledger for IFRS and a shadow ledger light for local GAAP which focusses on the specific valuation elements for a specific portfolio.